Page history
Talk:Run-length encoding
22 February 2018
20 July 2015
12 July 2015
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Is built-in on topic?: Generally looks OK, but in this specific case probably not?
+552
rosettacode>Zorro1024
→Is built-in on topic?: new section
+208
29 December 2012
28 January 2010
18 January 2010
MikeMol
→Require decode counterpart: Probably not, but I don't have a good answer.
+190
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Require decode counterpart
+392
MikeMol
→Require decode counterpart: new section
+747
14 January 2010
25 April 2009
rosettacode>DataWraith
Correct my comment (not a native speaker...)
m+20
rosettacode>DataWraith
no edit summary
+19
rosettacode>DataWraith
no edit summary
+1,366
24 April 2009
rosettacode>ShinTakezou
the rle i knew
+524
rosettacode>IanOsgood
alternate encoding
+267
rosettacode>IanOsgood
task is too limited (can't encode digits)
+207
76.167.241.45
New page: "The output can be anything." might be too open-ended. I would prefer it if all the solutions did it the same way, or something. --~~~~
+211