Page history
Talk:Range consolidation
1 April 2019
31 March 2019
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→A better-defined notation ?: Intervals.
+316
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→null range: added Paddy3118's signature (after-the-fact) to his response to show who replied to whom; the text is: ("That would be invalid input.").
m+212
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→null range: Not this time...
+295
Hout
→A better-defined notation ?
m+19
Thundergnat
→Perl 6 oddity: removed
m+390
Hout
→A better-defined notation ?
m+8
Hout
A better-defined notation ?
+1,054
Thundergnat
→null range: meh
m+376
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→null range: Inner/outer
+255
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→null range: split
+16
Hout
→null range
Hout
→null range: The task is to consolidate *lists* of ranges (rather than ranges).
+528
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→null range: invalid.
+41
30 March 2019
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→null range: added whitespace to know who's who.
m+2
Petelomax
→null range
+356
10 February 2019
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→null range: added clarification about a null range. .
m+219
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→The nature of these ranges, and thus of the task, is not yet clear: On normalization...
+215
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→null range: zero-extent ranges
+802
Nigel Galloway
→The nature of these ranges, and thus of the task, is not yet clear
+527
9 February 2019
4 February 2019
3 February 2019
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Python tester: sp.
m+2
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Python tester
+2,541
rosettacode>Paddy3118
Similar.
+346
Thundergnat
boundary included / not included notation?
+526
rosettacode>Paddy3118
More info.
+1,095
Hout
→The nature of these ranges, and thus of the task, is not yet clear
m−1
Hout
The nature of these ranges, and thus of the task, is not yet clear
+927