Anonymous user
Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Review templates: Difference between revisions
Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Review templates (view source)
Revision as of 14:44, 18 March 2014
, 10 years agoadded a request to enhance the 'needs-review' template.
No edit summary |
(added a request to enhance the 'needs-review' template.) |
||
Line 17:
Their is also the case of what happens if an entry has the template on for "a considerable time" and clearly does not complete the task or a significant part of the task? Maybe we should also have a "completion needed" flag so someone could mark an entry for completion or deletion after a reasonable period? I guess I would not like to see RC filled with mere place-holder entries, (that is not the case at present). Just my thoughts --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 03:19, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
==expand the template==
Could the ''needs-review'' template to be expanded to include a reason (explanation), much like the ''incorrect'' template has? That would make it much more usefull instead of just stating it ''may be incorrect due to a recent change in the task requirements ∙∙∙''.
Adding an ''explanation of the problem'' thingy to the template would really help in elaborating the why and whyfor of the flagging. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 14:44, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
| |||