Rosetta Code:Village Pump/LibRC, A Library for RosettaCode Code: Difference between revisions
Rosetta Code:Village Pump/LibRC, A Library for RosettaCode Code (view source)
Revision as of 15:51, 10 July 2016
, 7 years agono edit summary
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (Needs to be a blank line after Vptopic header or it won't show up in the correct place) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 19:
Of course, I'm willing to change this if you guys think that this is an inadequate or protracted naming scheme. (I'm not sure how we'll compile the interpreted languages like Make, CMake, etc.)
So, what do you guys think? If you want to help me with this project, simply say so and I'll work on adding you to the development team! (Or, you can even suggest other methods of working on this!)
: So we will have both support for 99 bottles of beer on the wall and for sleep sort in the same library?
: I joke, but so does some of the code...
: Anyways, if getting that to compile sounds like an interesting task. But before you spend too much time organizing, I think I would try to characterize some of the difficulties and some of the hardware dependencies that you care about.
: More than that, though, the primary benefit of Rosetta code is having something that people can read and compare. (But making sure all the code compiles is important - I know that I myself have sometimes come back later and found that code that I had written did not work, because I had either not made an edit or some other stupid mistake.)
: Still, if you also mean for this library to be of use to other people you would need to spend some time thinking about those people's needs and how to document the library and its use for them. The easy thing to do (just link to the site) will work about like just pulling down all the code samples and trying to compile them together.
: Anyways, *we* need efforts like yours, to help us isolate our problems. But I expect that most of the resulting library would mostly not be things most other people need. Still, the skills you might develop, working through this, might turn out to be useful to you, in other contexts.
: But I would not worry about the naming, either, I guess...
: (But, do not take my thoughts too seriously, either, I always manage to overlook important stuff.) --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 15:51, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
| |||