Rosetta Code:TODO: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(→‎TODO: Added Template:language)
(→‎TODO: Finished language headers)
Line 4: Line 4:
=TODO=
=TODO=
* Replace language example headers with the <nowiki>{{header|(language)}}</nowiki> template. '''Check''' 13 November 2007
* Replace language example headers with the <nowiki>{{header|(language)}}</nowiki> template. '''Check''' 13 November 2007
* Replace usage of Template:Programming_Language with Template:language. See [[RapidQ]] as an example.
* Replace usage of Template:Programming_Language with Template:language. See [[RapidQ]] as an example. '''Check''' 1 December 2007
* Look through the [[:Category:WikiStubs|stubs]], and research and fill in useful information. Cite sources as needed, of course. Remove stub template when done with each page.
* Look through the [[:Category:WikiStubs|stubs]], and research and fill in useful information. Cite sources as needed, of course. Remove stub template when done with each page.
* Comb through the suggestions on the [[Help:Request a new programming task|task request]] page and put a few together. Or drop some into a "Questionable" category, so they can be debated.
* Comb through the suggestions on the [[Help:Request a new programming task|task request]] page and put a few together. Or drop some into a "Questionable" category, so they can be debated.

Revision as of 04:26, 2 December 2007

Here's a list of "Someone needs to..." items. If you're looking for something to do, you can always do something on this list.


TODO

  • Replace language example headers with the {{header|(language)}} template. Check 13 November 2007
  • Replace usage of Template:Programming_Language with Template:language. See RapidQ as an example. Check 1 December 2007
  • Look through the stubs, and research and fill in useful information. Cite sources as needed, of course. Remove stub template when done with each page.
  • Comb through the suggestions on the task request page and put a few together. Or drop some into a "Questionable" category, so they can be debated.