DOS: Difference between revisions

m
updated final wp link to reflect page rename there
m (added a missing space)
m (updated final wp link to reflect page rename there)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4:
DOS by itself had no graphical interface; instead, if one was desired, users had to buy one seperately. Several GUIs were available for DOS, but [[Windows]] displaced them all with [[wp:Windows 3.0|version 3]]. DOS was still present in Windows 95, 98, and Me, but is totally absent from all NT-based versions (including NT, 2000, XP, Vista, and Windows 7), instead being emulated (via [[wp:Virtual DOS machine|NTVDM]] and [[wp:cmd.exe|cmd.exe]]).
 
Early versions of MS-DOS and PC-DOS included a [[BASIC]] interpreter (basic.exe), followed by [[BASICA]], [[wp:GW-BASIC|GW-BASIC]], and finally [[QuickBASIC#QBasic|QBasic]]. (QBasic wasn't installed by default under Windows 9x; it had to be copied from the install media.) There are compilers and/or interpreters for pretty much every programming language available for DOS.
 
Before the rise of MS-DOS, the term DOS was consideredused for a synonymspecific case of '''OS''', inone thethat pastwas able to use a disk drive (as opposed to things like tapes and punch cards), thus "'''disk''' operating system". There have been a number of operating systems called "DOS", besides the ones discussed here, many of which are completely different systems. (For a fairly complete list, see [[wp:DOSList (disambiguation)|theof disk operating systems|Wikipedia's disambiguationlist pageof disk operating systems]].)
1,150

edits