Category talk:Unimplemented tasks by language: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 07:36, 23 April 2009

Could it be noted on here how often these lists will update? We don't need people thinking that these are the current states of all the languages. --Mwn3d 21:22, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

SQL Derivatives and Esoteric Languages need to be taken out of this list. I guess there's no nice way of doing that. It looks like that would have to be hard coded into the bot since they don't look any different than any other programming language. --Mwn3d 00:09, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

You could create a list with only the languages that have attempted more than X% of the tasks. --Paddy3118 04:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

The link to Tasks not implemented in C++ actually leads to Tasks not implemented in C. --Ce 07:51, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Yeah. The switch to FCGI broke it. I'll get it fixed as soon ASAP, believe me. But work is insane right now. --Short Circuit 10:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Maybe a link from Tasks not implemented in C to Tasks not implemented in C++, similar to the one from Category:C to Category:C++ would be a good idea. However I don't know if this would survive bot changes or even confuse the bot. --Ce 07:36, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 The link to [[Tasks not implemented in C++]] actually leads to [[Tasks not implemented in C]]. --[[User:Ce|Ce]] 07:51, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 : Yeah. The switch to FCGI broke it.  I'll get it fixed as soon ASAP, believe me.  But work is ''insane'' right now. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 10:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
+:: Maybe a link from [[Tasks not implemented in C]] to [[Tasks not implemented in C++]], similar to the one from [[:Category:C]] to [[:Category:C++]] would be a good idea. However I don't know if this would survive bot changes or even confuse the bot. --[[User:Ce|Ce]] 07:36, 23 April 2009 (UTC)