Category talk:Unimplemented tasks by language: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(>X% of tasks?)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
SQL Derivatives and Esoteric Languages need to be taken out of this list. I guess there's no nice way of doing that. It looks like that would have to be hard coded into the bot since they don't look any different than any other programming language. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 00:09, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
SQL Derivatives and Esoteric Languages need to be taken out of this list. I guess there's no nice way of doing that. It looks like that would have to be hard coded into the bot since they don't look any different than any other programming language. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 00:09, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
:You could create a list with only the languages that have attempted more than X% of the tasks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 04:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
:You could create a list with only the languages that have attempted more than X% of the tasks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 04:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

The link to [[Tasks not implemented in C++]] actually leads to [[Tasks not implemented in C]]. --[[User:Ce|Ce]] 07:51, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:51, 22 April 2009

Could it be noted on here how often these lists will update? We don't need people thinking that these are the current states of all the languages. --Mwn3d 21:22, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

SQL Derivatives and Esoteric Languages need to be taken out of this list. I guess there's no nice way of doing that. It looks like that would have to be hard coded into the bot since they don't look any different than any other programming language. --Mwn3d 00:09, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

You could create a list with only the languages that have attempted more than X% of the tasks. --Paddy3118 04:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

The link to Tasks not implemented in C++ actually leads to Tasks not implemented in C. --Ce 07:51, 22 April 2009 (UTC)