Category talk:Programming paradigm/Object-oriented: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Latest revision as of 16:22, 22 April 2010

How much encouragement is a language supposed to provide, for OO programming, to fit this paradigm?

In other words, which of the categories of languages listed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_oriented_programming#OOP_languages would fit here?

--Rdm 15:48, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

My guess (because there are no rules about it other than wikiconsensus) is that if it's possible to use a paradigm in a language, it is practical to use that paradigm at least on occasion, and the official language documentation explicitly speaks of it, then it fits. Beyond that I think it's up to the community to decide whether a language fits a paradigm or not. --Mwn3d 16:22, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:48, 22 April 2010 (view source) Rdm (talk \| contribs) (Created page with 'How much encouragement is a language supposed to provide, for OO programming, to fit this paradigm? In other words, which of the categories of languages listed at http://en.wiki…')		Latest revision as of 16:22, 22 April 2010 (view source) rosettacode>Mwn3d No edit summary
Line 4:		Line 4:

	--[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] 15:48, 22 April 2010 (UTC)		--[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] 15:48, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
			:My guess (because there are no rules about it other than wikiconsensus) is that if it's possible to use a paradigm in a language, it is practical to use that paradigm at least on occasion, and the official language documentation explicitly speaks of it, then it fits. Beyond that I think it's up to the community to decide whether a language fits a paradigm or not. --[[User:Mwn3d\|Mwn3d]] 16:22, 22 April 2010 (UTC)