Category talk:HTML: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(category?)
 
m (moved Talk:HTML to Category talk:HTML: Merged HTML to Category:HTML, and the category has no talk page.)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


I've written up a somewhat longer, slightly more-detailed version of this page, but before I put it up, I want to see if there's any reason not to move this to a category. There are only 2 pages that link to [[:Category:HTML]] -- [[Empty Program#HTML]] and [[Basic Animation#JavaScript + HTML]] -- and I feel that making this a category ''might'' be overkill... or it might not be. After all, there's only so much one can do with a document layout language; most examples on RC are simply beyond plain HTML's capabilities. -- [[User:Eriksiers|Eriksiers]] 23:18, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
I've written up a somewhat longer, slightly more-detailed version of this page, but before I put it up, I want to see if there's any reason not to move this to a category. There are only 2 pages that link to [[:Category:HTML]] -- [[Empty Program#HTML]] and [[Basic Animation#JavaScript + HTML]] -- and I feel that making this a category ''might'' be overkill... or it might not be. After all, there's only so much one can do with a document layout language; most examples on RC are simply beyond plain HTML's capabilities. -- [[User:Eriksiers|Eriksiers]] 23:18, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

: It probably wants to be a bit like [[JSON]]. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 11:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:25, 28 July 2011

Category?

I've written up a somewhat longer, slightly more-detailed version of this page, but before I put it up, I want to see if there's any reason not to move this to a category. There are only 2 pages that link to Category:HTML -- Empty Program#HTML and Basic Animation#JavaScript + HTML -- and I feel that making this a category might be overkill... or it might not be. After all, there's only so much one can do with a document layout language; most examples on RC are simply beyond plain HTML's capabilities. -- Eriksiers 23:18, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

It probably wants to be a bit like JSON. –Donal Fellows 11:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)