Category talk:Free Pascal/Lazarus: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Pledge to remove this category)
 
(add an argument to remove this category/page.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
FreePascal/Lazarus should not be a category because it is not a particular Pascal dialect like ObjectPascal or iso-Pascal, but a compiler which actually implements several dialects. Therefore, it is more appropriate to put examples to the general Pascal category and add the "<nowiki>{{works with|Free_Pascal}}</nowiki>" label. This policy also prevents fragmentation in the presentation of the language. Therefore, I pledge for the removal of this category. --[[User:Mischi|Mischi]] 15:20, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
FreePascal/Lazarus should not be a category because it is not a particular Pascal dialect like ObjectPascal or iso-Pascal, but a compiler which actually implements several dialects. Therefore, it is more appropriate to put examples to the general Pascal category and add the "<nowiki>{{works with|Free_Pascal}}</nowiki>" label. This policy also prevents fragmentation in the presentation of the language. Since there is already a wiki page for FreePascal as an implementation (speak: compiler) of Pascal, I pledge for the removal of this category. --[[User:Mischi|Mischi]] 15:20, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:39, 28 January 2012

FreePascal/Lazarus should not be a category because it is not a particular Pascal dialect like ObjectPascal or iso-Pascal, but a compiler which actually implements several dialects. Therefore, it is more appropriate to put examples to the general Pascal category and add the "{{works with|Free_Pascal}}" label. This policy also prevents fragmentation in the presentation of the language. Since there is already a wiki page for FreePascal as an implementation (speak: compiler) of Pascal, I pledge for the removal of this category. --Mischi 15:20, 28 January 2012 (UTC)